General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

1972 Cutlass S Hardtop or Coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 9th, 2020, 07:57 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
w1po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 21
1972 Cutlass S Hardtop or Coupe

What's the difference in a Cutlass S Hardtop or a Cutlass S Holiday Coupe? I have a W-29 optioned L-34 442 and I can't see anything on the build sheet that would identify either.
Thanks,
Dan
w1po is offline  
Old July 9th, 2020, 08:01 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,229
In Oldsmobile parlance, "hardtop" equals "Holiday." A hardtop coupe is a two-door car with no pillar between the rear and front windows on each side. Oldsmobile called this body style "Holiday coupe." If there is a pillar there, the style is commonly referred to as a "Post Coupe." Oldsmobile called this style over the years "Club Coupe" or "Sport Coupe."

For 1972, Oldsmobile called the 2-door Cutlass S with post "Cutlass S Sports Coupe." The 2-door with no post was called "Cutlass S Hardtop Coupe."


1972 Cutlass S Hardtop Coupe





1972 Cutlass S Sports Coupe





Last edited by jaunty75; July 9th, 2020 at 08:11 AM.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old July 9th, 2020, 08:36 AM
  #3  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,485
The VIN will tell you what body style it is. For the 1972 model year, it's the third and fourth characters of the VIN (for the 1965-71 cars it was the fourth and fifth characters). "77" is a Sport Coupe, "87" is a Hardtop Coupe (called a Holiday Coupe in prior years). This info will also be on the cowl tag.

For the 1972 model year, the W29 option was only available on four models, the Cutlass Hardtop Coupe (3F87xxx VIN), Cutlass S Sport Coupe (3G77xxx VIN), Cutlass S Hardtop Coupe (3G87xxx VIN), and the Supreme convertible (3J67xxx VIN).



joe_padavano is online now  
Old July 9th, 2020, 09:13 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
w1po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 21
Excellent information. Thanks!

Dan
w1po is offline  
Old August 14th, 2020, 08:08 AM
  #5  
Frankenstein 442 owner
 
ThaDeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 128
But, why have both a hardtop and a coupe? Different purposes?
ThaDeuce is offline  
Old August 14th, 2020, 08:15 AM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,485
Originally Posted by ThaDeuce
But, why have both a hardtop and a coupe? Different purposes?
"Coupe" describes a 2dr, which could be either a hardtop or a sport coupe (with post). "Hardtop" means that there is no B-pillar and could be a 2dr (hardtop coupe) or a 4dr (hardtop sedan).
If your real question is, why did they have both a hardtop coupe and a sport coupe, well, in the 1960s and 70s automakers actually made cars in multiple body styles and even (GASP!) more than four colors. Today automakers have minimized body style, paint, and trim combinations to minimize production cost and maximize profits.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old August 14th, 2020, 10:15 AM
  #7  
Frankenstein 442 owner
 
ThaDeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
"Coupe" describes a 2dr, which could be either a hardtop or a sport coupe (with post). "Hardtop" means that there is no B-pillar and could be a 2dr (hardtop coupe) or a 4dr (hardtop sedan).
If your real question is, why did they have both a hardtop coupe and a sport coupe, well, in the 1960s and 70s automakers actually made cars in multiple body styles and even (GASP!) more than four colors. Today automakers have minimized body style, paint, and trim combinations to minimize production cost and maximize profits.
Makes sense since way more cars were ordered by the salesman with you sitting at the desk back then. More options to choose from before all the cost cutting started.
ThaDeuce is offline  
Old August 14th, 2020, 10:25 AM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,485
Originally Posted by ThaDeuce
Makes sense since way more cars were ordered by the salesman with you sitting at the desk back then. More options to choose from before all the cost cutting started.
Exactly. I don't think my parents ever bought a car off the lot, they always ordered to their taste. Today people want instant gratification. In the 60s and 70s there were very few "packages", you picked and chose the options you wanted. That's how you got a car with A/C and manual brakes and three-on-the-tree.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old August 14th, 2020, 10:28 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,401
The post cars were cheaper to make and cheaper to sell. There's no drawback to the hardtop cars except maybe a little heavier, so it was about offering cars at different price points. The trim reflects this. Holiday Coupes had nicer trim.
Koda is online now  
Old August 14th, 2020, 10:36 AM
  #10  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,485
Originally Posted by Koda
The post cars were cheaper to make and cheaper to sell. There's no drawback to the hardtop cars except maybe a little heavier, so it was about offering cars at different price points. The trim reflects this. Holiday Coupes had nicer trim.
Yeah, I hear that, but I'm struggling to understand exactly what was less expensive to make. As far as the Olds A-body cars were concerned, the Sport Coupes had more body pieces and more assembly processes and welds than did the hardtops, The basic body shell was the same - roof, gutter, inner structure, quarter panels, etc. The doors had the extra assembly process of adding the window frames. The rear quarters similarly had added assembly labor to install the rear window frames. The only place where there was a substantive difference in parts count was the window regulators for the doors and rear quarters. Since the windows ran in tracks all the way up, the post car regulators were somewhat simplified. The window installation and adjustment process was similarly less labor intensive for the Sport Coupes.

As far as the weight difference, it was only in the tens of pounds, and most of that was due to lighter weight sound deadening and lower-grade interiors that had nothing to do with the post vs hardtop differences. Arguably, the post car shell should be marginally stiffer than a hardtop, but again I suspect that is negligible. Frankly, the post cars were always the loss leaders. This was likely due to the introduction of the Holiday (hardtop) body style in the 1950s as the "upscale" models. That was pretty much the same marketing and branding success as the "Rocket V8" campaign.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old August 14th, 2020, 11:14 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,401
Well, the paint is the same, and the sheetmetal cost is negligible, and all that you said is right, so I am thinking it's all perception.
Koda is online now  
Old August 15th, 2020, 05:44 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Greg Rogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Harrison, Michigan
Posts: 4,741
Interesting thoughts. Why?? Maybe there was a market for the post cars because the older guys thought they were safer?? (As in roll over protection?) It does seem odd that they would continue with 2 different designs. And they even did it with 4 doors! Cutlass for sure and seems I remember 4 door hardtop Chevelles, not sure about Pontiac and Buick. Were there 4 door hardtop AMC's, Chryslers, Fords???
Greg Rogers is offline  
Old August 15th, 2020, 06:15 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
KW5413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 467
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Exactly. I don't think my parents ever bought a car off the lot, they always ordered to their taste. Today people want instant gratification. In the 60s and 70s there were very few "packages", you picked and chose the options you wanted. That's how you got a car with A/C and manual brakes and three-on-the-tree.
In today's world of rebates, qualifying vehicles have to be sold off dealers lots...special orders generally do not qualify. This defaults your options to what the mfg. and dealers says you want / need as most folks want that rebate and the instant gratification.

Another observation...once the deal is done, the dealer damned near insists that you drive your new vehicle home right-now-today. No matter how much stuff you want to remove from your trade. Once the contract is signed, they want that sucker off the lot.

On a personal level...the more cubby holes and storage opportunities they put in these trucks...the more I fill them up!
KW5413 is offline  
Old August 15th, 2020, 06:18 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
KW5413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 467
Originally Posted by Greg Rogers
Interesting thoughts. Why?? Maybe there was a market for the post cars because the older guys thought they were safer?? (As in roll over protection?) It does seem odd that they would continue with 2 different designs. And they even did it with 4 doors! Cutlass for sure and seems I remember 4 door hardtop Chevelles, not sure about Pontiac and Buick. Were there 4 door hardtop AMC's, Chryslers, Fords???
In a word..."Yes".
KW5413 is offline  
Old August 15th, 2020, 10:03 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Ctls442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 1,421
What are the differences between a Cutlass Hardtop and a Cutlass S Hardtop?
Ctls442 is offline  
Old August 15th, 2020, 10:57 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,401
None. They are the same car. S was used for the years when there was the Formal Roofline body, ie notchback. Olds called it the Cutlass Supreme, Chevy called it the Monte Carlo. The Cutlass S was the fastback car. So, in 70-72, there were Cutlass S and Cutlass Supreme bodies. An F-85 was a Cutlass S body.

Cutlass S did not exist for 63-67 for sure, and I don't think it did for 68 or 69 either, it was just Cutlass, and the Supreme was a trim.

Edit: I should say, given Joe's comment below, that I'm talking about the sheetmetal.

Last edited by Koda; August 15th, 2020 at 02:26 PM.
Koda is online now  
Old August 15th, 2020, 10:58 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,401
Addendum: 442's, 70-72, were Cutlass S Hardtop bodies, or Cutlass Supreme convertible bodies (as there was no S convertible body.)
Koda is online now  
Old August 15th, 2020, 11:43 AM
  #18  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,485
Originally Posted by Ctls442
What are the differences between a Cutlass Hardtop and a Cutlass S Hardtop?
They are just different trim levels with different standard equipment in the base price. For the 1972 model year, the "Cutlass Hardtop" was a 32xx body code, which USED to be the F-85. Olds went through a little nameplate inflation that year. The "Cutlass S Hardtop" was a 36xx body code. You can read the differences in the base equipment in the LH columns of these two pages from the SPECS booklet. Note, for example, that the Cutlass Hardtop Coupe came standard with rubber floor covering (just like the older F85s). The Cutlass S came with carpeting. The Cutlass S Hardtop came with stainless rocker and wheel opening trim, the Cultass Hardtop did not (again, just like the F85). Bucket seats were an available option on the Cutlass S Hardtop, but not on the Cutlass Hardtop (also, just like the F85). There was a $114 difference in MSRP base price between the two.




joe_padavano is online now  
Old August 15th, 2020, 02:50 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Ctls442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 1,421
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
They are just different trim levels with different standard equipment in the base price. For the 1972 model year, the "Cutlass Hardtop" was a 32xx body code, which USED to be the F-85. Olds went through a little nameplate inflation that year. The "Cutlass S Hardtop" was a 36xx body code. You can read the differences in the base equipment in the LH columns of these two pages from the SPECS booklet. Note, for example, that the Cutlass Hardtop Coupe came standard with rubber floor covering (just like the older F85s). The Cutlass S came with carpeting. The Cutlass S Hardtop came with stainless rocker and wheel opening trim, the Cultass Hardtop did not (again, just like the F85). Bucket seats were an available option on the Cutlass S Hardtop, but not on the Cutlass Hardtop (also, just like the F85). There was a $114 difference in MSRP base price between the two.



Ok, thanks Joe...that makes sense. So obviously there was no F-85 in 1972, right?
Ctls442 is offline  
Old August 15th, 2020, 03:04 PM
  #20  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,485
Originally Posted by Ctls442
Ok, thanks Joe...that makes sense. So obviously there was no F-85 in 1972, right?
Not a two door. The only F85-badged model in 1972 was the Town Sedan (four door post - top right in the page from the dealership brochure below), though that was also a 32xx body code. Note that in addition to the F85 Town Sedan, there was also a Cutlass Town Sedan, which was a 36xx body code, same as the Cutlass S two door models.






joe_padavano is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CutlassS1972
General Discussion
9
October 14th, 2014 09:02 AM
CutlassS1972
General Discussion
5
October 13th, 2014 09:09 AM
cutlass1972s
Cutlass
34
September 2nd, 2014 04:03 PM
rickbmac
Tech Editor's Desk
0
October 13th, 2012 04:52 PM
kenrod
General Discussion
2
April 15th, 2010 03:01 AM



Quick Reply: 1972 Cutlass S Hardtop or Coupe



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 PM.