General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

455 Engine Stamp Question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 19th, 2009, 02:14 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
showyourauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Question 455 Engine Stamp Question...

I have a 1970 442 convertible purchased from the original owner, show states that this is the original motor, with a pile of paperwork going back to new on the car. My confusion is, on the engine stamp pad the stamp reads "870Zxxxxxx" every thing i have read states that the vin stamp on the engine block should read "30Zxxxxxx". Has anyone else encountered this? All the other casting and date codes on the engine assembly seem to check out.

Thanks!

Last edited by showyourauto; October 19th, 2009 at 03:49 PM.
showyourauto is offline  
Old October 19th, 2009, 06:29 PM
  #2  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,444
Originally Posted by showyourauto
I have a 1970 442 convertible purchased from the original owner, show states that this is the original motor, with a pile of paperwork going back to new on the car. My confusion is, on the engine stamp pad the stamp reads "870Zxxxxxx" every thing i have read states that the vin stamp on the engine block should read "30Zxxxxxx". Has anyone else encountered this? All the other casting and date codes on the engine assembly seem to check out.

Thanks!
A 1970 block SHOULD start with a 30, where the 3 is Oldsmobile and the year is 1970. The third character is the assembly plant - your Z would indicate that the engine came from the Fremont, CA plant. Does the VIN match the last eight characters of the VIN derivative on the block?
joe_padavano is offline  
Old October 19th, 2009, 06:31 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
showyourauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Does the VIN match the last eight characters of the VIN derivative on the block?
Yes it does indeed.

Last edited by showyourauto; October 19th, 2009 at 09:50 PM.
showyourauto is offline  
Old October 19th, 2009, 11:25 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
442much's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 2,623
Originally Posted by showyourauto
Yes it does indeed.
How clean is the area you're looking at? Are you sure the "8" isn't really a "3"? Use a tooth brush to clean the area if it is dirty. Then report back. Don't know what to tell you about the "7".

Last edited by 442much; October 19th, 2009 at 11:27 PM.
442much is offline  
Old October 20th, 2009, 12:37 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
I wonder if the block could be a warranty replacement?
svnt442 is offline  
Old October 20th, 2009, 08:19 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
showyourauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by svnt442
I wonder if the block could be a warranty replacement?
How could i tell?
showyourauto is offline  
Old October 20th, 2009, 08:30 AM
  #7  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by showyourauto
How could i tell?
Warranty or any replacement blocks have a blank machined pad. Dealers were not known to stamp the pads of these blocks, though.
wmachine is offline  
Old October 20th, 2009, 08:36 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
showyourauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Is it possible, as will Chevy 454's, that if the owner had the engine block rebuilt- including decked, that the original stamp would have been destroyed and the machine shop would have restamped it?
showyourauto is offline  
Old October 20th, 2009, 09:12 AM
  #9  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Anything is possible, and I have seen blocks and heads that have additional stamping, but it has been (as I said) additional, and is just some unrelated letters and/or numbers.
I wouldn't think the numbers you posted would be a machine shop stamping.
I'm with Ken, have you take a *really* close look?
wmachine is offline  
Old October 20th, 2009, 10:31 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
showyourauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
I going to chalk this up to a factory stamping screw up. The original owner bought the car never had the motor out. It is obvious that car has never been apart at all before the motor was pulled to be rebuilt and this stamping anomoly was discovered. The bottom line is that this is a nicely restored, original drivetrain car with a factory stamp error. I am cool with that.
showyourauto is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
michaeljay0862
Wheels and Tires
13
August 21st, 2014 08:09 PM
Finn5033
General Discussion
6
November 9th, 2012 09:55 AM
socalrs
442
20
May 21st, 2012 04:30 PM
VikingBlue
General Discussion
4
July 30th, 2010 12:23 PM
Topless72
Big Blocks
0
April 30th, 2008 09:08 PM



Quick Reply: 455 Engine Stamp Question...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:54 PM.