Holley vs Edelbrock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 5th, 2010, 06:53 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
rkk69olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 151
Holley vs Edelbrock

Okay I know this topic has probably been discussed to death, but here's my experience with the 2. I put a 670 street avenger on my 350 and it did not like it. It was a brand new build and brand new carb

355
10:3.1 advertised compression pistions
Nodular crank
#5 heads with SS valves, HP springs and roller tip rockers
Edelbrock performer RPM cam, lifters and intake
Mallory unilite with MSD wires and autolite 85's
Flowtech ceramic coated headers
RobbMC fuel pump
TH350 with 2500 stall
3:42 gears

With the 670 it stumbled from idle, ran rich and overall did not perform well. Out of the box with nothing changed. Now I admit I am no Holley master so I probably did not tune it right. I tried different pump cams, adjusted accelerator pump, tried various discharge nozzles and jets with not resolve. I read all the articles and tried all the tricks with no success

I decided to put on a new 650 Edelbrock AVS and out of the box it works great. No stumble, idle is better, running cooler and not rich.

Could it be that the AVS is closer in design to the Q-jet which I hear is a great carb for a SBO?

Thanks
rkk69olds is offline  
Old November 5th, 2010, 11:27 PM
  #2  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
My experience exactly. Edelbrock is the best carb I've ever used.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old November 6th, 2010, 04:21 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Redog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,145
I've heard Holleys are better.

Now I'm confused
Redog is offline  
Old November 6th, 2010, 08:27 AM
  #4  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,480
Originally Posted by Redog
I've heard Holleys are better.
Well, they are definitely better than no carb at all...
joe_padavano is offline  
Old November 6th, 2010, 11:47 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
citcapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idano
Posts: 9,127
You'll find as many opinions on this subject as you would on any political issue. I prefer Holly carbs. I have run then on everything I own for over 40 years. I find them easy to tune and very responsive. I will admit they do not get the gas mileage of other carbs (according to people I know when we have done comparisons) but then again I don't build my engines for mileage. What ever floats you boat I say
citcapp is offline  
Old November 6th, 2010, 11:49 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,868
Never had any luck with Edelbrocks, had 3 over the years, sent them all back or sold them. Jmo.

There's something wrong with your Holley. I did a 436 BBC last year with an out of box 770 Avenger. Worked perfectly, didn't have to touch it. Did a 362 SBO with a 670, same thing, ran great untouched.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old November 6th, 2010, 12:14 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
firefrost gold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: mn
Posts: 2,444
best carb i have had was a 650 double pumper with mechanical secondaries but i have had and find the performer edelbrock easy to dial in my q jet is still too new to praise yet.
firefrost gold is offline  
Old November 6th, 2010, 04:56 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
ziff396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Muskegon Michigan
Posts: 1,015
Originally Posted by firefrost gold
best carb i have had was a 650 double pumper with mechanical secondaries but i have had and find the performer edelbrock easy to dial in my q jet is still too new to praise yet.
First I tried the edelbrock 750 performer. Okay, but the engine seemed to want more.
Next, I put on the 870 holley street avenger. Ran like hell, but I could not tune the rich idle out of it.
Now, I have a custom built 800 cfm quadrajet off a 403 built by Mountain Man carbs to my engine, convertor, trans, and rear end gears. Runs perfect. No rich idle, and actually goes better than the holley. JMO
ziff396 is offline  
Old November 6th, 2010, 07:39 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,868
Originally Posted by ziff396
First I tried the edelbrock 750 performer. Okay, but the engine seemed to want more.
Next, I put on the 870 holley street avenger. Ran like hell, but I could not tune the rich idle out of it. Wrong power valve maybe? That'll do it.
Now, I have a custom built 800 cfm quadrajet off a 403 built by Mountain Man carbs to my engine, convertor, trans, and rear end gears. Runs perfect. No rich idle, and actually goes better than the holley. JMO
cutlassefi is online now  
Old November 7th, 2010, 05:06 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
ziff396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Near Muskegon Michigan
Posts: 1,015
Power valve checked out right. There is alot of the same rich idle posts with these on other boards with no real answer. Well at least a year ago. Anyways, I have had the quadrajet on for about a year now and still am very happy with it.
ziff396 is offline  
Old November 7th, 2010, 07:41 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Olds92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 161
Edelbrock is better for street. Holley is better for drag.
Olds92 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OldsManNJ
Small Blocks
11
May 23rd, 2012 08:20 AM
jag1886
Small Blocks
0
February 14th, 2011 04:41 PM
Daverd
Parts Wanted
0
February 11th, 2011 08:31 PM
thatguy32567
Small Blocks
22
June 1st, 2009 06:59 AM



Quick Reply: Holley vs Edelbrock



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 AM.