W30 brake question...
#1
W30 brake question...
if one was to order a w30 in 70,71 or 72 could you get power front disc brakes, or was the standard disc brake the only one available. I have noticed that some of the w cars for sale have the brake booster on them...was this added?
Thanks,
Ted
Thanks,
Ted
#2
Power brakes were available on any of the automatic W-30s from 70-72. Not available on the 4 speeds. The 4 speed cam did not have enough vacuum. Funny thing is, The automatic W-30 had less HP but they only advertised the 4 speed numbers.
#3
Then the power front disc brakes were an option that would show up in the cars docs? Wonder how many came with the standard disc brake?
I see that it was RPO code JL2, as in the 68 442 docs....
I see that it was RPO code JL2, as in the 68 442 docs....
Last edited by sammy; December 15th, 2014 at 05:06 PM.
#4
Yes, a W-30 with power front disc brakes will show code JL2 on its docs, if you're lucky enough to have them.
As was stated, in order to get power disc brakes on a W-30, you had to first order an automatic transmission (M40). Looking at 1970 production data through June (so not quite the entire year), 47% of all W-30s were optioned with JL2. That's a lot! I estimate this means that about 66% of automatic W-30s also had power disc brakes. (Remember, you could order M40 but forgo JL2.)
Since all 1970 W-30s had disc brakes, if 47% of them had power disc brakes, then 53% must have had the standard disc brakes.
Interestingly, if you wanted A/C (C60) on your W-30 you had to not only order M40 but also JL2. I have no idea why.
As was stated, in order to get power disc brakes on a W-30, you had to first order an automatic transmission (M40). Looking at 1970 production data through June (so not quite the entire year), 47% of all W-30s were optioned with JL2. That's a lot! I estimate this means that about 66% of automatic W-30s also had power disc brakes. (Remember, you could order M40 but forgo JL2.)
Since all 1970 W-30s had disc brakes, if 47% of them had power disc brakes, then 53% must have had the standard disc brakes.
Interestingly, if you wanted A/C (C60) on your W-30 you had to not only order M40 but also JL2. I have no idea why.
Last edited by BlackGold; December 16th, 2014 at 02:47 PM.
#5
I have heard that the AC was challenging on a high cam car due to possibly throwing the belt, and because of lack of vacuum to run the controls. I can understand the lesser cam auto engine and the auto trans for the first one and second one, but the power brakes I can only guess that there was some sort of vacuum component or something part of the power brake system that the AC system needed?
I'm not sure how much I believe the vacuum for the controls part anyway.
I'm not sure how much I believe the vacuum for the controls part anyway.
#6
Believe it. The A/C system uses vacuum to operate the flapper doors in the HVAC box. Similarly, the vacuum booster for the brakes didn't meet performance standards with the low vacuum. I've never heard of a belt throwing issue. There was an issue with overspeed of the compressor, which is why A/C cars were limited to a 3.23 axle.
#7
I suspect that cooling capacity was a bigger issue. These engines run noticeably hotter on the highway with, say, 3.90 gears (ie, 3000+ RPMs). Add the heat from the A/C system to that and you've got problems, at least in the hotter climates.
#8
I thought I read / heard somewhere (prob the internet, so it must be true) that the compressors were built for optimal efficiency around 2000 rpm, ( may have been in one of the R13 vs R134 discussions on here ) and that is why the engineers went with the 3:23 as the design change. However, I do not see why ac and pb would be a must combination. If it was vacuum, wouldn't one rob the vacuum from the other?
#9
But, the Buick GS 455 could be had with a/c and 3:42's, even on the Stage 1, I would think that the same Frigidaire compressor was used as on Olds. So, some reason for the Olds engineers, or just a difference of opinion on warranty's.
#11
As for the 3.91 rear, it was optionally available on the AT cars.
#12
Joe, maybe you can help my memory out here. The auto writer...was it Huddington, Huffington? for the 60's 70's era who came out with a list of the horsepower for many of the musclecars based on their weight, gearing, and time/speed through the quarter mile. Didn't he say 440 hp for the '70 W30 4spd. It has been many years since I read/saw the article and I don't think that I have a copy anywhere.
#13
Joe, maybe you can help my memory out here. The auto writer...was it Huddington, Huffington? for the 60's 70's era who came out with a list of the horsepower for many of the musclecars based on their weight, gearing, and time/speed through the quarter mile. Didn't he say 440 hp for the '70 W30 4spd. It has been many years since I read/saw the article and I don't think that I have a copy anywhere.
#14
Not to compare apples to oranges (maybe apples to pears), but my non-high-performance normally aspirated BMW with a 116 cubic inch engine (1.9l) is rated at 138hp.
- Eric
#15
Which, interestingly, is still well less than the 1hp per cubic inch claimed by Chebby about four or five years before.
Not to compare apples to oranges (maybe apples to pears), but my non-high-performance normally aspirated BMW with a 116 cubic inch engine (1.9l) is rated at 138hp.
- Eric
Not to compare apples to oranges (maybe apples to pears), but my non-high-performance normally aspirated BMW with a 116 cubic inch engine (1.9l) is rated at 138hp.
- Eric
#16
#17
#18
This is not, of course, a criticism of the W30, nor an effort to ignore 28 years of technology (1970 to 1998), but just an expression of my surprise that that was the best that they could do with those cubic inches in a mass-produced, driveable engine.
- Eric
#19
Actually, it's a comment on the crappy Oldsmobile heads and the advances in CFD that have enabled the greatly improved head flow and performance in today's engines. Olds heads (and especially exhaust ports) are horrible. The E-brock heads are handicapped by preserving the Olds exhaust port location and geometry. That was a design decision they made for that product.
#21
1970 Cutlass/442 assembly manual sec.4 page 92 in the bottom left corner states.
"Dealer must not install 3.42,3.91,4.33,4.66 or 5.00 ratio in cars with air conditioning
or heavy duty cooling options". Previous owner did'nt know why ac was'nt working
when I bought my car. 4.33 in sf carrier.
"Dealer must not install 3.42,3.91,4.33,4.66 or 5.00 ratio in cars with air conditioning
or heavy duty cooling options". Previous owner did'nt know why ac was'nt working
when I bought my car. 4.33 in sf carrier.
#22
Noted auto journalist Roger Huntington wrote an article about what these engines actually put out; here is the list: (All are gross hp & torque figures.)
Engine------------------Advertised----Rated----------True
------------------------HP @ RPM---- Torque@ RPM-- HP @ RPM
Buick 455 Stage 1-------360@5000----510@2800------420@5400
Camaro Z/28 302--------290@5800----290@4200------310@6200
Chevelle 396 L-78-------375@5600----415@3600------400@5600
Corvette 427 L-88-------430@5200----450@4400------480@6400
Mopar 340-4 bbl---------275@5000----340@3200------320@5600
Mopar 440-Magnum------375@4600----480@3200------410@5400
Mopar 440 Six-Pack------390@4700----490@3200------430@5600
Mopar 426 Street Hemi---425@5000----490@4000------470@6000
Mustang Boss 302--------290@5800----290@4300------310@6200
Ford 351-4 bbl Cleveland--300@5400----380@3400------340@5600
Mustang Boss 351--------330@5400----370@4000------360@6000
Mustang 428 Cobra-Jet---335@5200----440@3400------410@5600
Mustang Boss 429--------375@5200----450@3400------420@5600
Oldsmobile 455 W-30-----370@5300----500@3600------440@5600
Oldsmobile 350 W-31-----325@5400----360@3600------350@5800
Pontiac Ram Air 400------366@5100----445@3600------410@5600
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Notes:
-The most underrated was probably the 428 Cobra Jet engine... its official rating of 335 hp was a joke, especially considering that the 390-4 bbl engine was also rated at 335 hp.
-The second-most underrated was probaby either the Mopar 426-Hemi or the 340-4 bbl. The 340-Six Pack was not listed, but with an advertised hp of 290@5000 rpm and torque of 340@3200 rpm, I would guess about 335 hp @ 6000 rpm.
-The actual power output of that 455 Olds W-30 is very impressive... 440 hp!"
Barrowed from the interweb.
#23
I think, if we truly care about the necessity of power brakes for AC on a W-30, we should look at the vacuum circuitry. If the brake booster was tied in as a vacuum reservoir for the AC controls, it might make sense.
#24
The A/C vacuum ball has MUCH less volume than the brake booster and wouldn't make a dent in the vacuum required for the brakes. The only common connection is that both are connected to manifold vacuum as a source.
#25
Yup. Figured all that. Still don't have an explanation why power brakes were required for AC, unless they didn't want to sound like jerks denying AC to stick shift dudes and blamed it on needing power brakes.
#26
The MT cars came with a 328/328 cam. The A/T cars came with a 285/287 cam. In the real world, the MT cars made more HP with that cam. In the marketing world they were both rated at 370 HP (which was LESS than the Toro motor with a milder cam and more restrictive heads, intake, and exhaust). You decide if the real world trumps the marketing world.
As for the 3.91 rear, it was optionally available on the AT cars.
As for the 3.91 rear, it was optionally available on the AT cars.
#27
Where have you been? A member since ‘07 and replying on an eight year old thread…. Maybe you’ve been saturated with pleasure driving the wheels off of that 70 W30 4spd w/4:33’s!!!!😂😊. (Jealous)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
delmontcrusier
General Discussion
63
May 28th, 2023 07:37 AM
Mocephus
Eighty-Eight
12
October 1st, 2021 09:45 AM
Del70
General Discussion
1
August 2nd, 2011 04:40 PM
jon69olds
Wheels and Tires
1
February 11th, 2011 11:57 AM