Troubleshooting
#41
My statement would have been clearer if I had said that the vacuum diaphragm doesn't ACTUATE opening. Yes, I could have worded it better. More to the point, I was specifically replying to a prior post (NOT yours, by the way, despite your need to make everything about you) that stated that a failure of the diaphragm could
PREVENT opening, which it cannot.
PREVENT opening, which it cannot.
this isn’t about me, you know that. You just can’t handle being wrong or being corrected.
Here’s more proof your statement about the dashpot is to hold the air door closed being false. There is a spec clearance between the dashpot rod and the slot in the air door arm. If it holds it closed, why is there clearance? It’s because it doesn’t
#42
And your description would still be incorrect. The vacuum diaphram is only used to retard the opening of the secondary air valves. It does NOT cause them to open. You can disconnect and plug the hose to that diaphragm and the secondary air valves will open even more quickly. Your statement from above is completely incorrect.
#43
Where you really need corrected is the manner in which you lash out. Exactly what is gained by insinuating someone else doesn't know as much as you purportedly know and then admonishing them for voicing their opinion by suggesting they can't comment. I'm sorry, that's offensive and really unnecessary. Everyone is entitled to comment, and should be able to comment w/o having another member slam dunk them in the face - it just isn't very pleasant.
#44
Where you really need corrected is the manner in which you lash out. Exactly what is gained by insinuating someone else doesn't know as much as you purportedly know and then admonishing them for voicing their opinion by suggesting they can't comment. I'm sorry, that's offensive and really unnecessary. Everyone is entitled to comment, and should be able to comment w/o having another member slam dunk them in the face - it just isn't very pleasant.
#45
Appreciate your effort to return the thread to civility, Norm, but you may have @Dynoking confused with somebody else. He didn't really lash out at anybody.
Please brush up on Q JET operation before commenting.
Last edited by Vintage Chief; May 24th, 2023 at 12:49 PM.
#46
Anyway, thanks everyone. I have an idea how to proceed now. I'll be back to let you know how things work out.
#48
#49
Peace,
Richard
#50
PS.
An easy way to check the vacuum chamber's operation is first ensure it is connected to the vacuum port and the hose is not split. Start the engine. The chamber link should be retracted and held into the chamber by engine vacuum. Use middle nose pliers to pull the vacuum hose off and watch the chamber linkage. It should extend outward from the chamber. Reconnect the vacuum hose and the linkage should retract. Sorry for all the static. All I ever intended was to help you by sharing my knowledge and experience. Please let us know how you make out.
An easy way to check the vacuum chamber's operation is first ensure it is connected to the vacuum port and the hose is not split. Start the engine. The chamber link should be retracted and held into the chamber by engine vacuum. Use middle nose pliers to pull the vacuum hose off and watch the chamber linkage. It should extend outward from the chamber. Reconnect the vacuum hose and the linkage should retract. Sorry for all the static. All I ever intended was to help you by sharing my knowledge and experience. Please let us know how you make out.
#52
Just for closure: fuel filter. As Matt warned, it was an anti-drainback type and the check valve froze. Everything else checked out good and the problem is solved.
Thanks to all who provided ideas, advice or entertainment.
Thanks to all who provided ideas, advice or entertainment.
#56
Tone and language: The tone and choice of words can significantly impact how a message is perceived. It's best to use a friendly and respectful tone, avoiding language that may come across as hostile or confrontational. Clarity and conciseness: Being clear and concise in your responses can help avoid misunderstandings. If you're sharing technical information or advice, it's essential to communicate it in a way that's easy to understand. Acknowledging other perspectives: Even if you disagree with someone else's response or advice, try to acknowledge their effort and perspective. It's possible to have different opinions without making it personal. Resolving conflicts positively: If you find yourself in a disagreement, try to resolve the issue positively. Sometimes, stepping back and letting go of a contentious discussion can be the best way to maintain peace and a positive atmosphere. Focus on the original goal: Remember that the primary goal of online discussions is usually to help the OP or contribute positively to the topic. Try to stay focused on that goal and avoid getting entangled in unnecessary conflicts.
#57
tone and language: The tone and choice of words can significantly impact how a message is perceived. It's best to use a friendly and respectful tone, avoiding language that may come across as hostile or confrontational. Clarity and conciseness: Being clear and concise in your responses can help avoid misunderstandings. If you're sharing technical information or advice, it's essential to communicate it in a way that's easy to understand. Acknowledging other perspectives: Even if you disagree with someone else's response or advice, try to acknowledge their effort and perspective. It's possible to have different opinions without making it personal. Resolving conflicts positively: If you find yourself in a disagreement, try to resolve the issue positively. Sometimes, stepping back and letting go of a contentious discussion can be the best way to maintain peace and a positive atmosphere. Focus on the original goal: Remember that the primary goal of online discussions is usually to help the op or contribute positively to the topic. Try to stay focused on that goal and avoid getting entangled in unnecessary conflicts.
#61
Tone and language: The tone and choice of words can significantly impact how a message is perceived. It's best to use a friendly and respectful tone, avoiding language that may come across as hostile or confrontational. Clarity and conciseness: Being clear and concise in your responses can help avoid misunderstandings. If you're sharing technical information or advice, it's essential to communicate it in a way that's easy to understand. Acknowledging other perspectives: Even if you disagree with someone else's response or advice, try to acknowledge their effort and perspective. It's possible to have different opinions without making it personal. Resolving conflicts positively: If you find yourself in a disagreement, try to resolve the issue positively. Sometimes, stepping back and letting go of a contentious discussion can be the best way to maintain peace and a positive atmosphere. Focus on the original goal: Remember that the primary goal of online discussions is usually to help the OP or contribute positively to the topic. Try to stay focused on that goal and avoid getting entangled in unnecessary conflicts.
murdesrapes is an interesting handle. What is its origin? It reminds me of the lyrics of a song from 1969.
BTW What year, make, model, vehicle do you own that made you join this site?
Last edited by Dynoking; July 17th, 2023 at 02:52 AM.
#62
#63
murdesrapes = most likely a bot of some type.
Actually second thoughts. I hope this isn't a virus. Moderators?
#64
Completely understand the basis of your query. User registered country of residence as Germany (DE) which may or may not coincide with user's IP address. Kiddies (tongue-in-cheek - hackers) often find a forum to "test" their program capabilities. A bot runs a program, often times drops into any social media forum/thread. They create user (name) account (opens 1st door which gains access to website) either manually or via their program which operates as a subterfuge. Program runs in first post (thread) message. This user registered @ 2:29pm (my EDT) & posted first message at same time. This is basic "kiddie" hack. What kiddies will often do next is create another different user (member) account and view their message/thread/post to see if the program ran successfully. Many far, far more sophisticated ways to run bot programs. And, to be straight-up about it, there's nothing to stop any current CO member from creating another CO member account, make one post and never check back in (perhaps just to make a point). I think Eric (Moderator) is always on top of the game. CO Antivirus s/w runs on CO servers continuously throughout the day providing the most up-to-date security intelligence updates (signatures) so I suspect it is highly unlikely to be a virus.
#66
Follow along, you'll see what's happening...phishing scam w/ a bit more disguise; however, be aware it is entirely possible to introduce a virus, Trojan Horse or back-door man-in-the-middle attack from such deviant behavior.
murdescrapes created a user account and logged in July 16th, 2023, 02:29PM. Luckily Member SY2455 (and others) created a Post quoting murdescrapes first post. NOTE this first post (captured via SY2455 quote) was edited by user member murdescrapes on July 17th, 2023, 10:14AM. murdescapes is still listed as having Posted only "1" (one) time - because an edit is not considered a new (additional) Post; albeit, murdescapes still demonstrates only one Post.
This is the clever part.
The last post to the thread was July 16th, 2023, by yourself (DYNOKING) at 09:42AM. One half hour later (after your last Post) murdescapes logged onto this website and edited their original Post by INSERTING a URL link into their original Post (#56).
I have notified the moderators.
Note the timestamps
SY2455 first captured the original quote - note the timestamp.
When they inserted the URL link - note the timestamp.
#67
Ah HAA!, (said like Jackie Gleason). Good sleuthing there Norm. I thought something was up. Fun71 put the bug in my ear. I chose the wording I used to try and elicit a response from m***s. You can't be too careful...
Last edited by Dynoking; July 20th, 2023 at 03:42 PM.
#68
#69
At the risk of revisiting the site of a trainwreck, my problem has returned, and worse now than ever. The car lurches and jerks and then will smooth out and run okay as long as you don't get on it or drive up any hills (which just results in more lurching and jerking). Sounds like classic fuel pump failure to me, so I got a new Carter M6109 and am in the process of installing it. I know, "throwing parts at it" without proper diagnosis, but fuel pumps are cheap.
My question now is, I remember reading in a thread here ('course I can't find it now) to use a dab of assembly lube on the cam contact arm and, having not built any engines lately, I don't have any assembly lube around here. Can I just go ahead and use lithium grease (which I have lots of)?
Thanks in advance.
My question now is, I remember reading in a thread here ('course I can't find it now) to use a dab of assembly lube on the cam contact arm and, having not built any engines lately, I don't have any assembly lube around here. Can I just go ahead and use lithium grease (which I have lots of)?
Thanks in advance.
#70
If you know the age of the pump do a pressure test on it. Have you verified the condition of all of your rubber fuel lines? I found out the hard way that while the outside of a couple of my fuel line looked great on the outside, the inside of the rubber was collapse due to the quality of gasoline today. Now I use fuel injection rated hose.
#71
My question now is, I remember reading in a thread here ('course I can't find it now) to use a dab of assembly lube on the cam contact arm and, having not built any engines lately, I don't have any assembly lube around here. Can I just go ahead and use lithium grease (which I have lots of)?
#72
check all rubber fuel line connections
While restoring the rear in my 1970 442 I found that the rubber fuel line from the gas tank to the hard line was kinked, almost closed off. The design of the hose requires pretty much a 90 degree angle, and this issue is easily spotted once you can look up from underneath the front of the fuel tank.
#73
If you know the age of the pump do a pressure test on it. Have you verified the condition of all of your rubber fuel lines? I found out the hard way that while the outside of a couple of my fuel line looked great on the outside, the inside of the rubber was collapse due to the quality of gasoline today. Now I use fuel injection rated hose.
While restoring the rear in my 1970 442 I found that the rubber fuel line from the gas tank to the hard line was kinked, almost closed off. The design of the hose requires pretty much a 90 degree angle, and this issue is easily spotted once you can look up from underneath the front of the fuel tank.
#74
#75
Inspected all hoses in initial diagnosis. Pump tested @ about 4.5 PSI in June which should be adequate (although I was surprised to see that spec per the CSM is 5.5-7.5). My concern here is that the problem being intermittent, is it possible to get a good reading and then have it crap out on the road anyway? Anyway, the deal is done and I'm replacing it. If the problem lies elsewhere, I'll know soon enough.
#76
I didn't perform a pressure reading on my fuel system the last time I replaced the mechanical fuel pump on my '71 350. I'll just mention I began to experience some modest hesitation on "occasions" over a four year period ... I "suspect" an ill-fitting or "weak" gasket might introduce a minor leak and reduce "some" fuel pressure. Good Luck!
#77
Your experience is helpful, Norm. I hope I have a similar experience. Right now, I'm headed back to town to find an adapter for the pump outlet fitting as the threaded female receptacle in the pump is a different diameter than the old one which I had planned to re-use. Wish me luck ... again!
#79
What I can't understand is why the exact same model number fuel pump by the same manufacturer (Carter M-6109) would use two different diameter fuel line fittings. Not only that, but the new one takes off at a 45° angle rather than the old one's 90°.
#80
Well, I hope others can benefit from my mistakes: do not order a Carter M6109 as a replacement fuel pump for a '69 4-4-2 unless you feel like thoroughly re-plumbing your fuel line. The weirdest thing is, the old pump that I removed was even stamped "M-6109" but its fuel line fitting angled differently and the female piece uses a different diameter.
Three weeks later, I hold in my hand a Delphi MF0152, which seems correct, at least visually. Tune in next week when I'll tell you why it won't work. Oh, and early warning for those headed down this road -- the Delphi does not come with a gasket. Fortunately, the Carter came with two and I haven't returned it yet.
Three weeks later, I hold in my hand a Delphi MF0152, which seems correct, at least visually. Tune in next week when I'll tell you why it won't work. Oh, and early warning for those headed down this road -- the Delphi does not come with a gasket. Fortunately, the Carter came with two and I haven't returned it yet.