1971 W-30 Convertible/ Mecum Kissimmee
#1
1971 W-30 Convertible/ Mecum Kissimmee
This car looks beautiful - comes with Broadcast Card and Protect-o-Plate. Going on the block next month at Mecum Kissimmee. Considering its rarity I was posting the car to see if anyone knew anything about this particular car or it’s history.
#4
Has everything to MAYBE convince the guy from CANADA!! assuming the documents are not counterfeit, the vin was not originally a 342 changed to 344, the engine and transmission vin derivatives numbers have not been restamped, on and on and on and on.
Signed "Karen"
Signed "Karen"
#7
It is a real car and one of the 110 produced with history back to the original owner, who I believe was a school teacher. The individual who purchased the car from the original owner performed the restoration. It was restored a while ago but has been well maintained.
The car was featured in the book “Million Dollar Muscle Cars” by Colin Comer.
During the Resto the original bench seat column shift configuration was changed to buckets with a floor shift. The trim tag was also changed to accommodate the modifications.
Interesting note is that since all 1971 W-30s had buckets as standard equipment, that the window sticker shows no monetary credit for ordering a bench seat in a convertible, while I have seen hardtops with a credit on the window sticker for deleting the buckets.
Also, there is at least one other similar W-30 , bench seat, column shift, same color combo which was originally sold new in California.
Of the 110 produced I believe that there are less than 50 considered to be real, but I would defer to Mr. Paul Martin, who has more up to date records on this.
The car was featured in the book “Million Dollar Muscle Cars” by Colin Comer.
During the Resto the original bench seat column shift configuration was changed to buckets with a floor shift. The trim tag was also changed to accommodate the modifications.
Interesting note is that since all 1971 W-30s had buckets as standard equipment, that the window sticker shows no monetary credit for ordering a bench seat in a convertible, while I have seen hardtops with a credit on the window sticker for deleting the buckets.
Also, there is at least one other similar W-30 , bench seat, column shift, same color combo which was originally sold new in California.
Of the 110 produced I believe that there are less than 50 considered to be real, but I would defer to Mr. Paul Martin, who has more up to date records on this.
Last edited by Stefano; January 1st, 2023 at 10:29 AM.
#8
During the Resto the original bench seat column shift configuration was changed to buckets with a floor shift. The trim tag was also changed to accommodate the modifications.
I have always said if I bought a W car new it would have been white, black stripes, white interior.
Last edited by no1oldsfan; January 1st, 2023 at 01:39 PM.
#9
1971 Oldsmobile 442 W-30 Convertible | T147.1 | Kissimmee 2023 (mecum.com)
Doesn't changing the trim tag defeat the purpose of proper orig. documentation?
Doesn't changing the trim tag defeat the purpose of proper orig. documentation?
#10
1971 Oldsmobile 442 W-30 Convertible | T147.1 | Kissimmee 2023 (mecum.com)
Doesn't changing the trim tag defeat the purpose of proper orig. documentation?
Doesn't changing the trim tag defeat the purpose of proper orig. documentation?
#11
This will be like the Agean car that got unwound for not disclosing a color change. I don't see where they disclose a
change from bench to buckets and more importantly a trim tag change. That's a big no-no in my book.
The things we don't know it's amazing. Thanks for enlightening us Stefano.
change from bench to buckets and more importantly a trim tag change. That's a big no-no in my book.
The things we don't know it's amazing. Thanks for enlightening us Stefano.
#12
I am so over this bullshit over restored car world.
PS: Check that front end alignment. 👍
Last edited by no1oldsfan; January 2nd, 2023 at 10:36 AM.
#13
This will be like the Agean car that got unwound for not disclosing a color change. I don't see where they disclose a
change from bench to buckets and more importantly a trim tag change. That's a big no-no in my book.
The things we don't know it's amazing. Thanks for enlightening us Stefano.
change from bench to buckets and more importantly a trim tag change. That's a big no-no in my book.
The things we don't know it's amazing. Thanks for enlightening us Stefano.
#15
#17
#18
In reality, probably not. Some things are rare because they are unpopular.
If they kept the original trim tag and disclosed that change I personally see nothing wrong with this. It's funny how people get so over upset about a car that someone else owns. The owner who had it restored obviously wanted buckets. His car his money spent to make it the way he wanted it. I guess I just don't get why someone gets so worked up over these things.
Last edited by cman442; January 2nd, 2023 at 06:51 PM.
#19
So true. Unfortunately public opinion usually over rules in cases like this. This is a 2nd w30 convertible that I've seen that was ordered with bench seat instead of buckets. Some guys back then wanted a bench so they could have their girlfriend next to them. That was what I was told by that owner who ordered it that way. It actually makes it rarer, but less popular.
If they kept the original trim tag and disclosed that change I personally see nothing wrong with this. It's funny how people get so over upset about a car that someone else owns. The owner who had it restored obviously wanted buckets. His car his money spent to make it the way he wanted it. I guess I just don't get why someone gets so worked up over these things.
If they kept the original trim tag and disclosed that change I personally see nothing wrong with this. It's funny how people get so over upset about a car that someone else owns. The owner who had it restored obviously wanted buckets. His car his money spent to make it the way he wanted it. I guess I just don't get why someone gets so worked up over these things.
So changing the body tag doesn't matter? That's all good right?
#20
#21
Yes it's good as long as it's not falsely advertised in my opinion. My point was that if the guy who owned the car paid for the restoration wanted it differently, his car his $$$. I personally wouldn't do that, but not my car. I appreciate it for what it is. Don't get me started. I'm just tired of all the negativity lately. If someone is being dishonest knowingly that's when I have big issues.
My other point is that most of the time general public interest will determine value more than cars rareness. That's why a 442 w30 clone will sell faster and most likely for more than an original W31 every time. You can have the nicest house but if it's in a neighborhood no one wants to live in it's not worth much regardless. It is what it is. Not saying it's right.
My other point is that most of the time general public interest will determine value more than cars rareness. That's why a 442 w30 clone will sell faster and most likely for more than an original W31 every time. You can have the nicest house but if it's in a neighborhood no one wants to live in it's not worth much regardless. It is what it is. Not saying it's right.
Last edited by cman442; January 3rd, 2023 at 04:54 AM.
#22
The cowl tag doesn't include the VIN and is not covered under FEDERAL laws (state laws vary). In any case, even with federal VIN tag laws, the actual crime is "intent to commit fraud", not the physical tampering. Fully disclosing that the cowl tag was altered covers the seller legally. Ethically is a different question.
#23
[QUOTEThe cowl tag doesn't include the VIN and is not covered under FEDERAL laws (state laws vary). In any case, even with federal VIN tag laws, the actual crime is "intent to commit fraud", not the physical tampering. Fully disclosing that the cowl tag was altered covers the seller legally. Ethically is a different question.][/QUOTE]
Exactly
Thanks Joe
Exactly
Thanks Joe
#26
The bench is lighter by a small but non-zero amount. We're talking 5-10 lbs kind of differences. The bigger difference is that the bench was a credit option over the standard equipment buckets in the 442, so it dropped the price by $68.46. In 1970 that was nothing to sneeze at.
#27
Good point. To further put things into perspective, an additional $200.00 would buy you the W-30 option.
#29
My understanding is that original tag was retained and another was made to reflect original numbers and dates but for to add bucket seat code. The original parts were also retained and sold with the car after it was restored. I haven’t seen the car for some time , but have been informed that the original trim tag might be back on the car at this point. Anyone have a picture of the current trim tag?
#30
My understanding is that original tag was retained and another was made to reflect original numbers and dates but for to add bucket seat code. The original parts were also retained and sold with the car after it was restored. I haven’t seen the car for some time , but have been informed that the original trim tag might be back on the car at this point. Anyone have a picture of the current trim tag?
#34
#35
Ok..I meant with or without the knowledge of the tag swap if everyone on here knows it pretty sure potential buyers will as well. Who knows for sure tho.
Last edited by Andy; January 4th, 2023 at 06:30 PM.
#36
I can assure you this car will bring a very, very good price. The car is a rare '71 W-30, factory air, convertible. The car is beautiful. The idea that buckets and a floor console replaced the original bench seat would not deter my interest whatsoever, and is much to do about nothing. If the seller includes the bench seat with the sale, great. The car has the window sticker, broadcast card and protect-o-plate. If this car had blue hood and side stripes and a blue interior, I would be all over the car.
Last edited by twilightblue28A; January 5th, 2023 at 03:44 AM.
#38
The bench is lighter by a small but non-zero amount. We're talking 5-10 lbs kind of differences. The bigger difference is that the bench was a credit option over the standard equipment buckets in the 442, so it dropped the price by $68.46. In 1970 that was nothing to sneeze at.
#40